Someone in Grand Prairie, Arlington, Mansfield, Dallas, Fort Worth, Cedar Hill, Duncanville, De Soto, Benbrook, Burleson, Cleburne, Weatherford, Granbury, or just about anywhere else in Texas might ask; What is the difference between an insurance policy and a contract!

Here is the answer – An insurance policy is a contract. Insurance policies are contracts, and as such are subject to rules applicable to the rules governing contracts. The Texas Supreme Court had this argued before them in a 1994 case styled, Hernandez v. Gulf Group Lloyds. In the case, the Texas Supreme Court affirmed this legal position regarding insurance policies.

A person who is sueing, that is, seeking to recover on an insurance contract must prove that the contract was in force at the time of the loss. Also, the person who is claiming under a policy is required to produce the insurance contract upon which he sues or to prove its terms. That is what the Tyler Court of Appeals stated in 1975, in the case Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Spain.

Not many people in Dallas, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, Arlington, Mansfield, Cedar Hill, Duncanville, De Soto, Lancaster, or elsewhere in North Texas have to worry about an issue that some gulf coast residents have to be concerned about. That is the drywall cases that have resulted from hurricane Katrina and hurricane Ike.

The Miami Herald published an article on January 3, 2011. The article is titled, Drywall Insurance Coverage Still Possible.” It was writen by Duane Marseller. Much of the article is quoted here.

The drywall cases are cases that resulted after hurricanes where homes were damaged. When this occurred there were a large number of homes that were repaired using a drywall product that was manufactured in China. It turned out that the drywall product was defective.

Weatherford, Parker County, Aledo, Azle, Mineral Wells, and other residents through out Texas would wonder what are the different ways of recovering losses that result from an insurance company or insurance company agent doing something wrong in the sale of an insurance policy.

The Texas Department of Insurance has a web-site that provides some information about insurance companies and insurance agents. There is also information at this site about insurance adjusters.

The Texas Supreme Court hears and issues opinions about situations that have happened across the state dealing with insurance related issues. Plus the lower appeals courts and the local courts have to hear and decide on insurance related cases on a fairly regular basis.

People in Grand Prairie, Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Mansfield, Garland, Mesquite, Rowlette, De Soto, Cedar Hill, Duncanville, and other places in Texas would like to think that people are honest with them in their business dealings. The majority of the time, this is true. Rarely does someone intentionally lie about a subject, but occassionly a misrepresentation is made, not on purpose, but accidently. When this is done it is called negligent misrepresentation.

Here is an example of negligent misrepresentation. This is from a 2003 case styled, New York Life Insurance Company, et al v. Phillip M. Miller. This case was decided by the Texas Court of Appeals, Austin.

Here is some background:

Insureds in Dallas, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, Mansfield, Cedar Hill, De Soto, Duncanville, Red Oak, Lancaster, Arlington, Forest Hills, and other places in Texas do not really understand the different parts of insurance transactions. Let’s try to get an understanding and be more educated about insurance transactions.

To understand the different ways disputes can arise, it is helpful to consider the sequence of events that is likely to occur. At its very simplest, the insurance transaction can be divided into the initial sale of the policy, and subsequent handling of claims. These can be broken down further to include:

(1) The sale of the policy: Initially, the consumer and insurer or insurer’s agent must communicate to establish a contractual relationship. Disputes may arise over what was asked for by the applicant, what was represented by the insurer or agent, or the timeliness of the insurer or agent in providing coverage. Issues may also arise about the truthfulness of the applicant or agent in disclosing information requested by the insurer;

Someone is Burleson, Granbury, Cleburne, Bembrook, Crowley, Dallas, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, Arlington, or any other place in Texas who has a disability insurance policy probably is not sure exactly how the policy works. Most people who have these types of policies get them through their job. When obtained through work the person usually gets a pamplet explaining some of the benefits but rarely is much attention paid to it. A few people will purchase them through an independent insurance agent who explains the coverage but even then, the explanation is quickly forgotten or not completely understood.

The Beaumont Court of Appeals decided a case in 1978, dealing with an insurance policy. The policy had different periods of disability that applied depending on whether the disability resulted from an accident or an illness. The style of the case is, Lone Star Life Insurance Company v. Joseph B. Griffin.

At the trial level, Griffin obtained a judgment against Lone Star Life Insurance Company (Lone Star). Lone Star appealed.

Disability income insurance coverage for someone in Grand Prairie, Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Bedford, Euless, Hurst, Lake Worth, Aledo, or anywhere else in Texas is usually expensive. In addition to being expensive, the policy language is sometimes difficult to interpret.

Disability income policies typically specify an amount that will be paid in the event of a disability (as defined in the policy) and a maximum length of a disability (as defined in the policy) and a maximum lenght of time for which such benefits will be paid (e.g., “$200 per month for up to 60 months”).

A beginning place to look to see how Texas regulates disability income insurance policies is the Texas Administrative Code. Title 28, Part 1, Chapter 3, Subchapter S, Rule Section 3.3005 deals with the definitions in policies. It reads:

Business owners in Dallas, Mesquite, Duncanville, Grand Prairie, Fort Worth, De Soto, Arlington, Mansfield, Seagoville, Rowlette, and other places in Texas may ask the same question. What ends up happening when a loss occurs in the business, is that the business owner calls his insurance company and makes a claim, then the insurance company tells that business owner that the type of loss that was incurred is not the type of loss that is covered under the commercial insurance policy.

The Aspen Daily News has reported a story that follows the above scenario. The title of the article is, “Jimmy’s Sues Insurance Company Over Bombed-Out 2008 New Years Eve.” The articles author is Brent Gardner-Smith.

Jimmy’s is a restaurant in Aspen, Colorado.

A lot of people in Fort Worth, Arlington, Colleyville, North Richland Hills, Keller, Roanoke, Azle, Aledo, Weatherford, Dallas, Grand Prairie, and other places in Texas own dogs. So, what does it matter?

Here is one answer to that question. It could result in your homeowners insurance being cancelled or at the least, it might result in increased premiums for your homeowners insurance policy unless you get rid of the dog. The type of dog will also make a difference in whether or not it affects you.

The Palm Beach Post ran an article back on August 6, 2010. The article was written by Laura Green and is titled, “Insurers Turning Down Coverge For Homeowners With ‘Bully’ Dog Breeds.”

Most people in places like Arlington, Grand Prairie, Dallas, Fort Worth, Mansfield, Benbrook, Burleson, Crowley, Granbury, and other places in Texas will have some sort of life insurance. But how true is that statement?

The Wall Street Journal published on article on October 3, 2010, titled, “Shift to Wealthier Clientele Puts Life Insurers in a Bind”. The article was written by Mark Maremont and Leslie Scism.

This article tells how the life insurance industry has enjoyed beneficial tax treatment for its products for most of the century. Whenever Congress tried to change the tax treatment enjoyed by beneficaries of the policies the life insurance companies could always holler: We protect widows and orphans.

Contact Information